The courts have found that the employee is protected by labour law from the moment the employment contract is concluded even if the employee has not yet started work; and even if the contract has only been orally agreed.
According to section 213 of the LRA an employee is:
- “any person, excluding an independent contractor, who works for another person or for the state and who receives, or is entitled to receive, any remuneration; and
- any other person who in any manner assists in carrying out or conducting the business of an employer…”
This definition seems strongly implies that the employer’s legal obligations begin on the day that the employee physically begins work. However, this is not necessarily so. For example, in the case of Wyeth SA (Pty) Ltd vs Manqele (People Dynamics, September 2003 page 39). Manqele was offered a position by the employer as a sales rep. The parties concluded a written contract of employment in terms of which he was to commence work on 1 April.
Prior to Manqele beginning work, he was advised that the employer was no longer prepared to employ him. In terms of the contract of employment, Manqele had been entitled to a company vehicle. The employer believed that Manqele had made a misrepresentation as to the status of the car he had chosen, and on this basis took the view that there was no contract, as the parties had not reached agreement as to the condition of the motor vehicle stipulated in the letter of appointment.
Manqele took the matter to the CCMA where the arbitrator ruled that Manqele had become an employee the moment he accepted Wyeth’s offer of employment. Wyeth took the arbitrator on review at the Labour Court on the grounds that the arbitrator had arrived at an “unjustifiable conclusion in ruling on the definition of an employee”.
That is, Wyeth argued in the Labour Court that Manqele did not become an employee merely because of the employment contract. This argument is supported by an earlier Labour Court finding in the case of Whitehead vs Woolworths (Pty) Ltd (1999 20 ILJ 2133). In that case the Court found, according to the report, that a person who is party to a contract of employment but who has not yet commenced employment is not an employee for the purposes of the LRA.
However, despite the Woolworths case finding the Court, in the Manqele case found that, as a party to a valid and binding contract of employment, Manqele was an employee for the purposes of the LRA. The employer later took the matter further to the Labour Appeal Court (In Wyeth SA (Pty) Ltd vs Manqele & others 2005, 6 BLLR 523) but lost yet again. The Court upheld the earlier decisions by the CCMA and Labour Court that Manqele had achieved legal employee status the moment his employment contract was signed.
This decision poses a number of concerns for employers.
- Firstly, the fact that two different benches of Labour Appeal Court judges (Woolworths on the one hand and Wyeth on the other) made two such diametrically opposed decisions on a matter as fundamental as this one creates major uncertainty as regards the law.
- Secondly, employers are now clueless as to whether they are or are not entitled to cancel employment contracts prior to commencement of work.
- Thirdly, where the parties have agreed in principle that the employee will get the job it is now not clear whether a disagreement on the terms of the employment does or does not delay the legal validity of the contract of employment.
In the light of these dangers employers should:
- Avoid entering into employment agreements until all the terms and conditions have been dealt with thoroughly
- Ensure that, before offering anybody a job, there are no obstacles to allowing the candidate to take up the position
- Make it clear that the discussion of the terms and conditions of a contract in no way constitutes an offer of employment.
- Never employ, contract with or cancel the employment contract of any person without involving a labour law expert experienced in dealing with these tricky issues.
To observe our experts debating hot labour law topics please click the Labour Law Debate item in the menu at Labour Law Management Consulting.